Manga vs. Comics: Size Matters
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 12:13 pm
It occured to me, while discussing the failings of the comics industry and its attempts to gain new readership, that one of the biggest problems with modern comics is their lack of content. Many of the hardcore fans seem to feel that art matters more than writing, and that the lack of lengthy dialoge and the removal of the informative editors boxes of the past are both good things. Comics can, assuming minimum proficiency in reading, be finished in 15 minutes or less, and stories are less intricate than ever before in hopes of being "less complicated" and "more accessible"(a few of the more recent stories are proving exceptions to this, but as it has been a trend for the last decade, I'm not counting my chickens yet). Far fewer individuals are picking up comics as a hobby depsite the increase in publicity from wildly successful movies based upon comics, and the demographics of the industry, while they have broadened a bit, are still dominated by white males, with the average reader base growing older each year.
Interestingly however, we have a similar medium, manga, that has grown immensely since its mainstream introduction to the US in the late 90's. At the time when comics were downsizing, inflating prices, and reducing plot, manga gave readers access to longer stories for less money, dialogue driven stories, and intricate plots. Female readership of manga skyrocketed, and many younger readers of both sexes jumped on the manga bandwagon. Is it just coincidence? I wonder.
Many of the older comic fans that I speak to can't stand the place the industry has been in for the last decade, and have quietly jumped ship. Of the females that I speak to on the subject, I get the same comments repeated continuously regarding comics: "the characters aren't interactive enough, there is no dialogue, the stories are too short, the distribution too confusing." Does manga have these problems? No, of course not, as manga is, as a genre, almost the exact opposite of those criticisms.
What does this mean for the comic industry? Well, personally I think it means that the industry will have to evolve or die. In my opinion, consolidation is the way of the future. X-men needs to be a compilation book detailing all the x-universe, all the bat family needs to be together in one or two books, perhaps like a graphic novel, perhaps like a compilation of short stories. But the characters need to be consistent, the length needs to be increased dramatically, and the universe needs to be regulated by a team of dedicated artists and writers, rather than a bunch of guys itching to make their mark on characters that have a significance far beyond a 6 issue run of a given writer/artist. This new set up would also solve other problems that have been plagueing the industry. Continuity? Simple. Buy back issues of X-men, you find out about X-men; no more hunting through 18 different series and re-starts of the same series, staring at four different copies of X-force #1 wondering how on earth one is supposed to catch up with such a convoluted system of telling stories.
Having a consolidated book allows for better quality control, better and faster production, increases sales (charge more for the supersized meal and everyone wins right?), lowers operating costs (fewer different books to ship, fewer writers/artists to pay), and increases back issue sales. The books become far more appealing across a wider base, especially those that were alienated by the closed nature of the hobby. And, because of the simplicity of the model, one a consumer that has just veiwed the newest batman flick only needs to walk in to whatever bookstore they prefer, and purchase a copy of batman to be instantly involved in that universe and know everything going on in it, making new fans much more easily acquired. Also important, back issue sales increase dramatically, providing another income stream for the industry, and with the consolidated nature of such back issues, continuity is more effectively maintained by the writing staff.
Sure, new books won't be as numerous, and artists/writers will be out of jobs, but that is a sacrifice I'm personally willing to make. And really, if some of the books are done compilation style, kind of like the old Unlimited books marvel used to put out, most of the current artists and writers will still have a job, and such compilation books provide a venue for introducing new and interesting stories without as much business risk as producing a whole comic line. There could even be whole compilations devoted to new ideas.
Really, where's the catch?
Interestingly however, we have a similar medium, manga, that has grown immensely since its mainstream introduction to the US in the late 90's. At the time when comics were downsizing, inflating prices, and reducing plot, manga gave readers access to longer stories for less money, dialogue driven stories, and intricate plots. Female readership of manga skyrocketed, and many younger readers of both sexes jumped on the manga bandwagon. Is it just coincidence? I wonder.
Many of the older comic fans that I speak to can't stand the place the industry has been in for the last decade, and have quietly jumped ship. Of the females that I speak to on the subject, I get the same comments repeated continuously regarding comics: "the characters aren't interactive enough, there is no dialogue, the stories are too short, the distribution too confusing." Does manga have these problems? No, of course not, as manga is, as a genre, almost the exact opposite of those criticisms.
What does this mean for the comic industry? Well, personally I think it means that the industry will have to evolve or die. In my opinion, consolidation is the way of the future. X-men needs to be a compilation book detailing all the x-universe, all the bat family needs to be together in one or two books, perhaps like a graphic novel, perhaps like a compilation of short stories. But the characters need to be consistent, the length needs to be increased dramatically, and the universe needs to be regulated by a team of dedicated artists and writers, rather than a bunch of guys itching to make their mark on characters that have a significance far beyond a 6 issue run of a given writer/artist. This new set up would also solve other problems that have been plagueing the industry. Continuity? Simple. Buy back issues of X-men, you find out about X-men; no more hunting through 18 different series and re-starts of the same series, staring at four different copies of X-force #1 wondering how on earth one is supposed to catch up with such a convoluted system of telling stories.
Having a consolidated book allows for better quality control, better and faster production, increases sales (charge more for the supersized meal and everyone wins right?), lowers operating costs (fewer different books to ship, fewer writers/artists to pay), and increases back issue sales. The books become far more appealing across a wider base, especially those that were alienated by the closed nature of the hobby. And, because of the simplicity of the model, one a consumer that has just veiwed the newest batman flick only needs to walk in to whatever bookstore they prefer, and purchase a copy of batman to be instantly involved in that universe and know everything going on in it, making new fans much more easily acquired. Also important, back issue sales increase dramatically, providing another income stream for the industry, and with the consolidated nature of such back issues, continuity is more effectively maintained by the writing staff.
Sure, new books won't be as numerous, and artists/writers will be out of jobs, but that is a sacrifice I'm personally willing to make. And really, if some of the books are done compilation style, kind of like the old Unlimited books marvel used to put out, most of the current artists and writers will still have a job, and such compilation books provide a venue for introducing new and interesting stories without as much business risk as producing a whole comic line. There could even be whole compilations devoted to new ideas.
Really, where's the catch?