In remembrance of all the joy, and misery, of past games. Leave your offerings here.
Post Reply
User avatar
rydi
Site Admin
Posts: 4063
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:29 pm

sos: hates the fourth ed.

Post by rydi »

you people will hate me for this, but i'm not sure i want to run this in dd. concepts and all that can stay, but i just really feel that 4th ed is only good for video/board game style play. i think it is really good for that, mind you. just not for alot else.

i'm working on d4 right now. maybe we'll use it.
Last edited by rydi on Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Threading the Gerbil since 1982

Image
User avatar
Thael
Lost Knight
Posts: 747
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:04 pm
Location: Out of my gourd

Post by Thael »

have you listened to the podcasts with penny arcade and pvp artists playing?? you might change your mind...
That which is not dead can eternal lie and with strange eons even death may die
My Color is Blue
I value Knowledge, logic, and deceit. I love to pursue wisdom but also to manipulate and deceive. At my best, I am brilliant and progressive. At my worst, I am treacherous and cold. My symbol is a water droplet. My enemies are green and red.
Image
User avatar
rydi
Site Admin
Posts: 4063
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:29 pm

Post by rydi »

i find it difficult to see how the role play heavy game i want to play will be aided by this system.

while an argument can be made that without defined stats for personality and "fluff" skills, one is free to develop more and to make a more well rounded character, in my experience that is not the case. when there is little to nothing of fluff in the character creation, very little tends to go into the play.

i want a system with better skills, specifically crafting and knowledge. and i want more spellcasting options, more like schools of magic. while the ideas behind the new spell arrangement are good for certain things, if you want to emulate the different specialty schools of magic that are common tropes in certain settings (which i do) then you are out of luck.

hell, at this point 5th age is looking better than this.
Threading the Gerbil since 1982

Image
User avatar
rydi
Site Admin
Posts: 4063
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:29 pm

Post by rydi »

so, this will run off of D4 i have decided. my apologies to anyone that even still cares about this game.

i think d4 will run it better, and i think SoS will be a good platform for fleshing out the system.
Threading the Gerbil since 1982

Image
User avatar
Jack
Knight
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 12:58 pm

Post by Jack »

I DM a 4th ed. game right now. It's fun. LOTS of fun. The players make up for the lack of "fluff" skills built into a character. Their lack actually brings them into sharper focus and allows more RP with less dice.

Combat is streamlined to a degree and it's a ton of fun.

Itemization SUCKS. I've gone back and reworked items from 3.5 to compensate for the deplorable lack of anything truely useful in the new system. The Armory book is coming out soon with 1000+ items, though...will have to see if that helps.

You should come play one sunday....or watch....just to see that it CAN be fun.





On a side note, I think it's far more fun for the players and far more complex for the DM. Your tricky fights and puzzles can be circumvented entirely by the use of the once-per-day super-abilities of characters if they combine them entirely. You can't balance everything around that possibility either, since you'd kill your party on the second or third round after they've blown those abilities.

I've adjusted by creating the encounter and including a "sideboard" of options to throw in depending on where the players stand. I always want to give them a challenge, but not blatently kill them unless they do something stupid. It's been fun so far.
Fear that which you have invited among you.
Wait with bated breath for what shall be revealed to you.
Revel in unabashed pleasure in that which you learn.
User avatar
rydi
Site Admin
Posts: 4063
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:29 pm

Post by rydi »

might be fun to watch/play. honestly, a good group can make up for alot of system problems. i've seen some horrible systems that turned into great games just because everyone was working together super well. i still have my doubts as to the value of 4th ed as an rp system however.
Threading the Gerbil since 1982

Image
User avatar
Rusty
Lost Soul
Posts: 2183
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:01 am
Location: Oklahoma City
Contact:

Post by Rusty »

I'm confused.
User avatar
Liquidprism
Lost Soul
Posts: 1509
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:40 pm
Location: Behind You...

Post by Liquidprism »

I could clarify, but I won't cause I don't know how. That makes me a liar.
All things in moderation...Except syrup.

<a href="http://www.wizards.com/magic/playmagic/ ... areyou.asp" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.wizards.com/magic/images/wha ... isblue.jpg" border="0">
<b>Take the Magic: The Gathering 'What Color Are You?' Quiz.</b></a>
User avatar
rydi
Site Admin
Posts: 4063
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:29 pm

Post by rydi »

by what?
Threading the Gerbil since 1982

Image
User avatar
durden
Lost Knight
Posts: 819
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:30 pm

Post by durden »

So Cheyne...would you have sleep with 4th ed? What if it wore a bag over its face?
User avatar
rydi
Site Admin
Posts: 4063
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:29 pm

Post by rydi »

pygmy allosaurus.
Threading the Gerbil since 1982

Image
Post Reply